La Universidad en la Era Digital: Inteligencia Artificial, Redes Sociales y Transformación del Aprendizaje
Palabras clave:
Educación superior, Redes sociales, Inteligencia artificial generativa, Transformación del aprendizaje, Universidad digitalSinopsis
La Universidad en la Era Digital: Inteligencia Artificial, Redes Sociales y Transformación del Aprendizaje surge de una preocupación académica concreta y de un momento histórico que la vuelve ineludible. En apenas tres años, la inteligencia artificial generativa ha pasado de ser una promesa técnica a una mediación cotidiana de la escritura, la lectura y la toma de decisiones de los estudiantes universitarios; en paralelo, las plataformas sociales han consolidado su lugar como entornos informales donde se construye identidad, se consume información académica y se negocian criterios de verdad. Ambos fenómenos, operando de manera convergente, están reconfigurando de modo estructural no únicamente instrumental lo que significa aprender, enseñar y producir conocimiento en la universidad contemporánea. Este libro nace de la convicción de que comprender ese cambio es, hoy, una tarea académica prioritaria.
El propósito de la obra es ofrecer al estudiante universitario y al docente en ejercicio una revisión crítica de la literatura internacional disponible sobre inteligencia artificial generativa, redes sociales y aprendizaje en educación superior. No se trata de un informe de investigación empírica propia ni de la presentación de hallazgos originales obtenidos por los autores; se trata, deliberadamente, de un texto de revisión que sistematiza, organiza y pone en diálogo la evidencia publicada entre 2023 y 2026, incorporando además marcos teóricos consolidados y fuentes clásicas pertinentes. Frente a la velocidad con la que se multiplican artículos, documentos de política y herramientas, el libro asume una función de mediación: seleccionar, contrastar y traducir esa producción a un lenguaje accesible sin renunciar al rigor académico.
La obra se organiza en nueve capítulos distribuidos en cuatro bloques de progresión conceptual. Un primer bloque de diagnóstico y marcos (capítulos 1 y 2) sitúa a la universidad en la era digital y presenta los marcos teóricos sociedad red, conectivismo, subjetividad digital que permiten interpretarla. Un segundo bloque de fenómenos (capítulos 3 a 5) examina por separado la inteligencia artificial generativa y las redes sociales, para luego estudiar su convergencia en ecosistemas integrados. Un tercer bloque sobre consecuencias (capítulos 6 y 7) analiza los patrones de adopción estudiantil de IA y sus implicaciones para la integridad académica y la ética universitaria. Un cuarto bloque de respuesta institucional (capítulos 8 y 9) traduce lo revisado a implicaciones pedagógicas, curriculares y de política, y propone una agenda de investigación situada.
Los destinatarios de este texto son, en primer lugar, los estudiantes universitarios de grado y de posgrado que necesitan marcos legibles para comprender el ecosistema digital en el que ya estudian y trabajan. En segundo lugar, los docentes en ejercicio que buscan fundamentos para rediseñar sus asignaturas, sus criterios de evaluación y sus estrategias de acompañamiento en escenarios mediados por asistentes generativos. Por esta razón, cada capítulo articula objetivos de aprendizaje, preguntas de enfoque, desarrollo argumental apoyado en fuentes verificables, cajas pedagógicas, glosario, autoevaluación y actividades de consolidación. La obra dedica atención particular al contexto latinoamericano y ecuatoriano, donde la transición digital se produce sobre infraestructuras desiguales y sobre tradiciones institucionales en activo debate sobre calidad, pertinencia y masificación.
Corresponde, finalmente, reconocer las limitaciones de un proyecto como éste. La literatura revisada es mayoritariamente anglófona y recoge solo parcialmente las realidades universitarias de América Latina; la evidencia sobre algunos fenómenos la convergencia IA redes, las prácticas de autoría compartida con asistentes generativos, el efecto a largo plazo sobre la cognición estudiantil es todavía preliminar y, en ocasiones, contradictoria; y el ritmo de cambio tecnológico hará que algunas descripciones envejezcan antes que sus marcos interpretativos. El libro no oculta estas limitaciones: las asume como parte de su vocación abierta. Más que ofrecer respuestas cerradas, aspira a dotar al lector de un marco crítico robusto y de una invitación explícita al diálogo. Si estas páginas contribuyen a que estudiantes y docentes se aproximen con mayor criterio a las tecnologías que ya median su vida académica, el propósito de la obra estará cumplido.
Referencias
Acosta, A. (2018). Universidad, autonomía e innovación en América Latina. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM).
Aghaee, N. M., et al. (2024). Generative AI in higher education: Educators’ perspectives. Euro-pean Conference on e-Learning (ECEL), 23(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34190/ ecel.23.1.3090
Almarashdi, H. S., et al. (2024). Systematic review of ChatGPT in mathematics teaching and learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. https:
//doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15739
Alsharefeen, R., & Al Sayari, N. (2025). Academic integrity policy and practice in the era of AI.
Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1621743 AlZaabi, A., et al. (2023). ChatGPT applications in academic research: A review. https://doi.
org/https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.17.553688
Anthropic. (2024). The Claude Model Family: Claude 3 Opus, Sonnet, and Haiku. https://www. anthropic.com/claude
Astleitner, H., & Schlick, S. (2025). The social media use of college students: exploring identity development, learning support, and parallel use. E-Learning and Digital Media. https:
//doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874241233605
Bates, A. W. (2022). Teaching in a Digital Age: Guidelines for Designing Teaching and Learning (3rd). Tony Bates Associates Ltd. https : / / pressbooks . bccampus. ca / teachinginadigitalagev3m/
Baytas, C., & Ruediger, D. (2025). Making AI generative for higher education. ITHAKA S+R. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.322677
Beneitone, P., Esquetini, C., González, J., Maletá, M. M., Siufi, G., & Wagenaar, R. (Eds.). (2007). Reflexiones y perspectivas de la educación superior en América Latina: Informe final — Proyecto Tuning América Latina 2004–2007 [Reimpresión con addenda 2014]. Universidad de Deusto / Universidad de Groningen. https : / /tuningacademy.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/TuningLAIII_Final-Report_SP.pdf
Bernabei, M., et al. (2024). Exploring generative AI in higher education: a RAG system to enhance student engagement with scientific literature. Frontiers in Psychology. https :
//doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1474892
Boyd, d. (2014). It’s Complicated: The Social Lives of Networked Teens. Yale University Press. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in
Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Qualitative Research
in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589-597. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/ 2159676X.2019.1628806
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 1877-1901. https://papers.nips. cc/paper/2020/hash/1457c0d6bfcb4967418bfb8ac142f64a-Abstract.html
Brunner, J. J., & Miranda, D. A. (Eds.). (2016). Educación Superior en Iberoamérica: Informe 2016. Centro Interuniversitario de Desarrollo (CINDA) / RIL Editores. https://www. researchgate . net / publication / 313423057 _ Educacion _ Superior _ en _ Iberoamerica -
_Informe_2016
Bruns, A. (2019). Filter bubble. Internet Policy Review, 8(4). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.
14763/2019.4.1426
Carretero, M., & Limón, M. (2005). Construcción del conocimiento y enseñanza de las ciencias sociales y la historia. En M. Carretero (Ed.), Construir y enseñar las ciencias sociales y la historia (pp. 33-59). Aique.
Castells, M. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society (Vol. 1). Blackwell.
Castells, M. (2023). The Network Society Revisited. American Behavioral Scientist, 67(7), 940-946. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642221092803
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. J. (1998). The Extended Mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/58.1.7
Clegg, N. (2024). How Meta AI works across our apps. Consultado el 25 de marzo de 2026, desde https://about.fb.com/news/2024/04/meta-ai-assistant/
Cobo, C. (2019). Acepto las condiciones: Usos y abusos de las tecnologías digitales. Fundación Santillana.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd). Lawrence Erl-baum Associates.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2017). e-Learning ecologies: principles for new learning and assess-ment. e-Learning Ecologies. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315639215
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2022). The cybernetics of learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 54(14), 2352-2388. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2022.
2033213
Cox, A. L., Gould, S. J. J., Cecchinato, M. E., Iacovides, I., & Renfree, I. (2016). Design Frictions for Mindful Interactions: The Case for Microboundaries. Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1389-1397. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2851581.2892410
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (6th). SAGE Publications.
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: the state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Cruz García, L., & Blanes Ugarte, A. V. (2024). The disruption of artificial intelligence in con-temporary Latin American universities: an exploratory study across three countries. Re- encuentro. Análisis de Problemas Universitarios, 37(89), 11-28. https : / /reencuentro. xoc.uam.mx/index.php/reencuentro/article/view/1347
Dabis, A., & Csaki, C. (2024). AI and ethics: First policy responses of higher education institu-tions to the challenge of generative AI. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03526-z
Dacey, C. M., et al. (2026). Editorial: AI in educational and business ecosystems. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1780854
De Zubiría Samper, J. (2006). Los modelos pedagógicos: hacia una pedagogía dialogante (2nd).
Cooperativa Editorial Magisterio.
DeVito, M. A. (2017). From editors to algorithms: A values-based approach to understanding story selection in the Facebook news feed. Digital Journalism, 5(6), 753-773. https:
//doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2016.1178592
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidi-rectional transformers for language understanding. Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2019, 4171-4186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-1423
Díaz Barriga, Á. (2011). Competencias en educación. Corrientes de pensamiento e implicacio-nes para el currículo y el trabajo en el aula. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación Su-perior, 2(5), 3-24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.20072872e.2011.5.44
Divekar, R. R., et al. (2025). Exploring undercurrents of learning tensions in an LLM-enhanced landscape. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.02622
Erickson, J. (2024). Rethinking the filter bubble? Developing a research agenda for the protective filter bubble. Big Data & Society, 11(1). https: / / doi. org / https: / / doi. org / 10. 1177 / 20539517241231276
Field, A. (2018). Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th). SAGE.
García Flores, H., et al. (2024). Desafíos y oportunidades de la inteligencia artificial en la educa-ción superior latinoamericana: una revisión sistemática de la literatura. Revista InveCom,
4(2). https://revistainvecom.org/index.php/invecom/article/view/3859
García-Martín, S., & García-Sánchez, J.-N. (2022). Impact of digital technologies upon teaching and learning in higher education in Latin America: an outlook on the reach, barriers, and bottlenecks. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10. 1007/s10639-022-11214-1
García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2023). The perception of artificial intelligence in educational contexts after the launch of ChatGPT: disruption or panic? Education in the Knowledge Society, 24, e31279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.31279
Garg, R. K., et al. (2023). Exploring the role of ChatGPT in patient care and medical education. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.13.23291311
Google DeepMind. (2024). Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Models. https:
//doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312.11805
Greeves, S., & Oz, M. (2024). YouTube in higher education: comparing student and instructor perceptions and practices. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10. 3389/feduc.2023.1330405
Gruenhagen, J. H., Sinclair, P. M., Carroll, J. A., Baker, P. R. A., Wilson, A., & Demant, D. (2024). The rapid rise of generative AI and its implications for academic integrity: stu-dents’ perceptions and use of chatbots for assistance with assessments. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100273. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j. caeai.2024.100273
Hällgren, C., & Björk, N. (2023). Young people’s identities in digital worlds. International Jour-nal of Information and Learning Technology, 40(1), 49-65. https://doi.org/https://doi. org/10.1108/IJILT-06-2022-0135
Hayes, A. F., & Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use omega rather than Cronbach’s alpha for estimating reliability. But… Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629
Heaton, D., et al. (2024). Agency, trust, and blame in Twitter discourses after ChatGPT. AI and Ethics. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-023-00414-1
Hinojo-Lucena, F. J., et al. (2023). Digital transformation and technological innovation on higher education post-COVID-19. Sustainability, 15(3), 2466. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su15032466
Hofeditz, L., et al. (2025). Ethical guidelines for generative AI in journalism. Digital Society. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-024-00151-w
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Inc., S. (2024). Say hi to My AI: Snapchat’s new chatbot powered by ChatGPT. Snap Newsroom. https://newsroom.snap.com/say-hi-to-my-ai
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (INEC). (2022). Estadísticas de tecnologías de la información y comunicaciones (TIC) 2022 (inf. téc.). Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos. Quito. https://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/estadisticas-de-las-tecnologias-de-informacion-y-comunicacion-tic/
Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robison, A. J. (2009). Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century. MIT Press.
Ji, Z., Lee, N., Frieske, R., Yu, T., Su, D., Xu, Y., Ishii, E., Bang, Y. J., Madotto, A., & Fung, P. (2023). Survey of hallucination in natural language generation. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(12), 1-38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/3571730
Johnston, H., Wells, R. F., Shanks, E. M., Boey, T., & Parsons, B. N. (2024). Student pers-pectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence technologies in higher educa-tion. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 20(1), 2. https:// doi. org/ https:
//doi.org/10.1007/s40979-024-00149-4
Karkoulian, S., et al. (2024). ChatGPT unveiled: Understanding perceptions of academic inte-grity. Journal of Academic Ethics. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09543-6
Kasneci, E., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kim, M., et al. (2025). Generative AI in higher education: demographic differences in student perceived readiness, benefits, and challenges. TechTrends. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11528-025-01109-6
Kondoro, A. M. (2025). AI writing assistants in Tanzanian universities. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Intelligent and Interactive Writing Assistants (In2Writing 2025). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.in2writing-1.4
Kotsis, K. T. (2025). AI and the future of physics curriculum in higher education. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Continuing Research, 4(5), 12-16. https:// doi. org/ https:
//doi.org/10.54660/ijmcr.2025.4.5.12-16
Lewis, P., Perez, E., Piktus, A., Petroni, F., Karpukhin, V., Goyal, N., Küttler, H., Lewis, M., Yih, W.-t., Rocktäschel, T., Riedel, S., & Kiela, D. (2020). Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 9459-9474. https : / / papers . nips . cc / paper / 2020 / hash / 6b493230205f780e1bc26945df7f3d0b-Abstract.html
Manca, S. (2020). Snapping, pinning, liking or texting: Investigating social media in higher education beyond Facebook. The Internet and Higher Education, 44, 100707. https:// doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100707
Mhlanga, D. (2023). Digital transformation education, opportunities, and challenges of the ap-plication of ChatGPT to emerging economies. Education Research International. https:
//doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7605075
Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research (inf. téc.). UNESCO. Paris. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54675/EWZM9535
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G. S., & Dean, J. (2013). Distributed representa-tions of words and phrases and their compositionality. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 26. https://papers.nips.cc/paper/5021-distributed-representations-of-words-and-phrases-and-their-compositionality
Naqvi, W. M., et al. (2025). Critical thinking in the age of generative AI: educational challenges and opportunities. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10. 3389/frai.2025.1571527
Nesi, J., et al. (2024). A systematic review of social media use and adolescent identity develop-ment. Adolescent Research Review, 10(2), 219-236. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10. 1007/s40894-024-00251-1
Nguyen, H., & Diederich, M. (2023). Facilitating knowledge construction in informal learning: a study of TikTok scientific, educational videos. Computers & Education, 205, 104896. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104896
OpenAI. (2023). GPT-4 Technical Report (inf. téc.). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.2303.08774
Panchal, J. (2025). The role of AI in research and academic publishing. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 7(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr. 2025.v07i02.40848
Pariser, E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. Penguin Press.
Pedro, F., Subosa, M., Rivas, A., & Valverde, P. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: challenges and opportunities for sustainable development (inf. téc. N.o 7). UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000366994
Perkins, M. (2023). Academic integrity considerations of AI large language models in the post-ChatGPT era: ChatGPT and beyond. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Prac-tice, 20(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53761/1.20.02.07
Qian, Y. (2025). Pedagogical applications of generative AI in higher education. TechTrends. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-025-01100-1
Raghavan, P. (2024). AI Overviews: Bringing the power of generative AI to Google Search. The Keyword. https://blog.google/products/search/generative-ai-google-search-may-2024/
Ramírez, R. (2016). Universidad urgente para una sociedad emancipada (Informe institucio-nal). Secretaría de Educación Superior, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (SENESCYT). Quito.
Risko, E. F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2016). Cognitive Offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(9), 676-688. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002
Roumbanis, L., et al. (2025). Higher education students’ perceptions of ChatGPT: a global study of early reactions. PLOS ONE, 20(2), e0315011. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0315011
Salas-Pilco, S. Z., et al. (2022). Student engagement in online learning in Latin American higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. British Journal of Edu-cational Technology. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13190
Salas-Pilco, S. Z., & Yang, Y. (2022). Artificial intelligence applications in Latin American higher education: a systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239- 022-00326-w
Sallam, M. (2023a). ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. Healthcare, 11(6), 887. https:
//doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11060887
Sallam, M. (2023b). The utility of ChatGPT as an example of large language models in healthcare education, research and practice. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.19. 23286155
Selwyn, N. (2019). Should Robots Replace Teachers? AI and the Future of Education. Polity Press.
Selwyn, N. (2022). Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates (3rd). Bloomsbury Aca-demic.
SENESCYT. (2019). Cifras de educación superior del Ecuador 2019 (Boletín estadístico). Se-cretaría de Educación Superior, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación. Quito. https://www. senescyt.gob.ec
Sheeran, P., & Webb, T. L. (2016). The Intention–Behavior Gap. Social and Personality Psy-chology Compass, 10(9), 503-518. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12265
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3-10. https://www.itdl.org/ Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm
Soh, N. W., et al. (2024). Identity development in the digital context. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12940
Spataro, J. (2024). Copilot for LinkedIn: AI-powered professional networking. Official Microsoft Blog. https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2024/copilot-linkedin/
Stokel-Walker, C. (2022). TikTok vs YouTube: What the data says about the battle for attention.
New Scientist. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2340806-tiktok-vs-youtube/ Stone, B. W. (2025). Generative AI in higher education: uncertain students, ambiguous use cases,
and mercenary perspectives. Teaching of Psychology. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10. 1177/00986283241305398
Su, X., & Huang, J. (2023). Modelling the predictive effects of social media on the relationship between students’ engagement and academic achievement in higher education institu-tions. Cogent Education. https:// doi. org/ https:// doi. org/ 10 . 1080 / 2331186X. 2023 . 2207801
Swart, J. (2021). Experiencing algorithms: How young people understand, feel about, and engage with algorithmic news selection on social media. Social Media + Society, 7(2). https:
//doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211008828
Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. W. (2007). Editorial: The New Era of Mixed Methods. Jour-nal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 3-7. https:// doi. org/ https:// doi. org/ 10 . 1177 / 2345678906293042
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., et al. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
Tünnermann Bernheim, C. (2008). La educación superior en América Latina y el Caribe: diez años después de la Conferencia Mundial de 1998. IESALC-UNESCO / Pontificia Uni-versidad Javeriana.
Turkle, S. (2015). Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age. Penguin Press. UNESCO-IESALC. (2020). COVID-19 y educación superior: de los efectos inmediatos al día después (Informe). Instituto Internacional de la UNESCO para la Educación Superior
en América Latina y el Caribe. Caracas. https://www.iesalc.unesco.org/wp-content/ uploads/2020/05/COVID-19-ES-130520.pdf
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., & Polo-sukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30. https://papers.nips.cc/paper/7181-attention-is-all-you-need
Villarroel, V., & Bruna, D. (2014). Reflexiones en torno a las competencias genéricas en educación superior: un desafío pendiente [Psicoperspectivas, 13(1), 22–34. DOI: 10.5027/psicoperspectivas-Vol13-Issue1-fulltext-335]. Psicoperspectivas.
Wineburg, S., et al. (2024). Bursting the belief in filter bubbles: a single-class activity to enhance critical thinking on algorithmic personalization. Learning, Media and Technology. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2024.2367766
Wu, T. (2019). Blind Spot: The Attention Economy and the Law. Antitrust Law Journal, 82(3), 771-806.
xAI. (2024). Grok: Real-time AI assistant on X. Consultado el 25 de marzo de 2026, desde https://x.ai/blog/grok
Xu, W., & Ping, W. (2025). Editorial: Foreign language teaching and learning in the era of AI.
Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1668049 Younis, H. A., et al. (2024). Systematic review and meta-analysis of artificial intelligence
tools in medicine and healthcare: Applications, considerations, limitations, motivation and challenges. Diagnostics, 14(1), 109. https : / / doi . org / https : / / doi . org / 10 . 3390 / diagnostics14010109
Zhang, Z. (2025a). Integrating generative AI in higher education. Education Journal, 14(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20251403.12
Zhang, Z. (2025b). Practical applications of generative AI in educational support. Education Journal, 14(3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20251403.14
Zhou, Y., Zhou, Y., & Machtmes, K. (2024). Mixed methods integration strategies used in edu-cation: a systematic review. Methodological Innovations. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/ 10.1177/20597991231217937
Descargas
Publicado
junio 17, 2026
Derechos de autor 2026 EduLearn Academy SAS
Detalles sobre esta monografía
ISBN-13 (15)
978-9907-831-02-3
Cómo citar
Jara Zea, L. Y., Vitonera Rogel, R. A., & Guzman Heras, L. E. (Eds.). (2026). La Universidad en la Era Digital: Inteligencia Artificial, Redes Sociales y Transformación del Aprendizaje. EduLearn Academy SAS. https://doi.org/10.64973/edu.2026.2544
